Sunday, December 15, 2013

Open reading 4

2009 Question 3


Response 3A


Nice introduction. You start with a great diction, using words like potent to show your education, and vary your syntax to keep the reader reading. The way you write allows the sentences to roll off the paper and you do so while sticking to the prompt. Your second paragraph proves the point of the essay by stating the symbol out right: and with language like “this blissful ignorance persevere” the reader is urged to read on. Your next paragraph is full of in text evidence which can become dry to read, but you keep it interesting with your strong diction using the word “rabid” to describe the quest. With unique word choice you are able to keep the reader enthralled in your piece and with solid evidence you prove your point. Overall I think you did a perfect job and the readers did too giving you a 9, great job.


Response 3B


Your directly answer the  prompt in the first sentence of your paper and although it is good to have a strong thesis you may want to add an attention grabbing sentence in the very beginning. Your diction in this piece is basic if you had more time with this essay I would tell you to review some of your word choice like using “appear” twice in one sentence. Although the word choice is simple you do a great job at demonstrating your knowledge of the symbol (lamp shade) and how it relates to the theme and characters of the book. I like your choice of the word “fantastical” but it implies that it is unreal so you do not need to say “fantastical and unreal”. Your paragraph explaining the back story to the lamp shade sticks with the prompt and you do a great job explaining it. Overall you did good job I think with an opportunity for editing you would have a top natch paper, the reader gave you a 6 which i think is a bit low but they have valid points like your introduction.

Response 3C

Your first sentence does not draw me in; by saying "pride and strength and power" you do not hold yourself to the college level of writing. It is important to keep literature in present tense so "carried" should be carries. The symbol of power stays close to the prompt. But your thesis sentence is unclear and you could increase this essay with a higher diction. Also white men are known as Caucasians today. Besides this fact your second paragraph is okay but you need to relate it back to the prompt. So is the machete a symbol or does it hold magical powers? I am not sure in the third paragraph about women. Many times you start a quote from the book but do not explain it further. Overall this is a poor essay and you should focus on the prompt, maybe read it multiple times while you are writing the essay. The readers agree with me by giving you a 4 and noting that you need to elaborate on ideas you have.

3 comments:

  1. Hey Ana,
    First off, I really like how you stuck to your pattern of mentioning the quality of the intro paragraph for each essay. As AP Lit students approaching the (horrifying) test in May, it is imperative that we know how important a strong introductory sentence, or paragraph, is to get a high score. You made sure to include examples from each essay in your responses and made helpful suggestions. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. One thing that would be helpful is if you put the question at the beginning of your post. For the first response you did a great job showing details from the essay and giving your opinion. I have never seen an essay that really deserved a 9, or maybe I just overlooked one, so this is interesting that the essay was so well done. The unique word choice is something that I know I have to focus on when writing my essays so I am glad that you pointed it out. In the second response, you make another good point of talking about the diction and the attention grabbing sentence, again good reminders about what the AP exam may want. If you do not think they deserved a 6, what do you think they deserved? Lastly, you did the same thing as the previous two paragraphs and explained the essay. Diction seemed to be a repeated theme in all of these essays so I feel like the AP will really want good diction. Overall great response!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ana, you do a great job of explain what you thought of the essays, Giving out detail and providing examples of why the essay got what it deserved. I also liked that you said that for response 3B, if they could edit it a bit, they could have received a better score. You do a great of pointing out the wrongs and the rights of each essay and giving little tips to improve. Great job!

    ReplyDelete