Although most people avoid confrontation, I believe it is important in our conversations. We can not hope to improve our knowledge if we are never challenged and so each position adds to our knowledge. The debate about whether Albee's play is a farce or a satire shows this as the conclusion is made that it may be a mixture of both; that his unique play may not fit into one category.
The human brain is constantly trying to organize every thought, so this work proposes a challenge. The diction is informal but the man behind it is a genius. His use of malapropism with the changing of "bundle" to "bumble" shows his careful thinking. To an unsophisticated person this can go undetected, just as the whole play's representation goes undetected by those who believe it is a play that is a theater of the absurd play, but to Mrs. Holmes students, who know that it is not theater of absurd, this word play does not go unnoticed.
Many connection are made in class that I would not have thought of, just think about the doll house.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAna,
ReplyDeleteI like how you use "Juxtaposition" to sum up AP Lit. The use of collaborating articles to help us expand our knowledge and challenge us to think in a completely new way is differently is brilliant. I enjoy paying attention in the discussions and every time someone points out/ makes a new observation the face that everyone makes is priceless. From out of all my classes, the discussions we have in this class is so the most beneficial because not only is a time to challenge ourselves but it also brings us closer together.
When Ms. Holmes gave us the articles, how else were the articles useful to you?
Hi Ana,
ReplyDeleteI also definitely agree with Lilly that wow, that was a great opening to this post. I'd like to add that not only do the discussions teach us more about the play, but also about ourselves and each other as well. I've come to expect certain things from certain people in our class, and I've personally learned a ton about analysis through our discussions.
I am also impressed with how deeply you thought about Ms. Holmes' motivations for getting us to discuss as a class. You went into psychology; I stayed at "Ahh everyone's so good at this!"
What do you think of this new style of participating in class, with emphasis on "This is what college will be like"? With Harvey's book, and everyone speaking so sophistically?
Curtis